Resources
Quiz
Because people who argue regarding BTC MOBICK are surroundedby ignorance throughout their lives, they wish to interpret the ultimate causesof events in the world around them. However, due to insufficient knowledge,many of them choose conspiracy theories. There are various conspiracy theories,among those the most well-known theory is narratives about global financialpowers. This involves the Freemasons. The basic framework of the theory is thathistorically well-organized powerful force controls global finance and governthe country, and this is the reason why citizens go through hard time. Conspiracytheories often vary its framework. Philosophically, conspiracy theories can becriticized as an over-interpretation of people’s ‘intentions’ because they generallyemphasize someone's intentions in events or situations. In essence, it isbelieved that ‘evil people with malicious intentions’ dominate the world, andbehind all the events we face, there is a conspiratorial plan by these evilforces. Is it important to understand the intentions of powerful people orthose involved in specific events to comprehend the world or interpret everydayincidents we encounter? The answer could be 'yes' and 'no'. Many people who criticizeBTC MOBICK Project also question 'intentions'. List all the arguments(evidences) that critique intention of the project, and refute these arguments.
Because people who argue regarding BTC MOBICK are surroundedby ignorance throughout their lives, they wish to interpret the ultimate causesof events in the world around them. However, due to insufficient knowledge,many of them choose conspiracy theories. There are various conspiracy theories,among those the most well-known theory is narratives about global financialpowers. This involves the Freemasons. The basic framework of the theory is thathistorically well-organized powerful force controls global finance and governthe country, and this is the reason why citizens go through hard time. Conspiracytheories often vary its framework. Philosophically, conspiracy theories can becriticized as an over-interpretation of people’s ‘intentions’ because they generallyemphasize someone's intentions in events or situations. In essence, it isbelieved that ‘evil people with malicious intentions’ dominate the world, andbehind all the events we face, there is a conspiratorial plan by these evilforces. Is it important to understand the intentions of powerful people orthose involved in specific events to comprehend the world or interpret everydayincidents we encounter? The answer could be 'yes' and 'no'. Many people who criticizeBTC MOBICK Project also question 'intentions'. List all the arguments(evidences) that critique intention of the project, and refute these arguments.
As far as I know, the critics regarding intention of the founder(O Teamin) of BTC MOBICK are as follow,: 1. The creator implemented the projectto gain financial benefits, and as the value increases, he will secretly sellthe coins within his public key or the coins he owned before the airdrop. 2. Ifthe creator transfers BTC MOBICK to companies according to his own blueprintwithout gaining financial benefits, and burns all his holdings, there is noreason to conduct the project, therefore it makes it untrustworthy. It is hardto believe as a rational person that the creator goes through all these fornothing. It is believed that no rational person could trust this. If thecreator sells the 14.6 million BTC MOBICK that he owns, the ecosystem willcollapse, so no one will buy them. Moreover, the money gained from selling therelatively small number of BTC MOBICK owned before the airdrop is too trivialcompared to the fame and status he would gain if the project proceeded asdesigned, so a rational person would not do so.
Currently, about 14.6 million BTC MOBICK are held by the creator,around 4 million have been airdropped, and approximately 1.5 million have beenburied for various reasons. The public keys of the creator and the buriedvolume are publicly disclosed, and anyone can monitor this due to the nature ofblockchain. Most altcoin projects that are deemed scams attract individualinvestors with various blueprints, where initial investors and developers selltheir holdings for financial benefits, and the projects become ambiguous orcollapse.
However, the creator of BTC MOBICK Project has his face andbackground publicly disclosed. Whether intentional or not, Dohyung Kwon fromthe collapsed Luna-Terra project fled with only Bitcoin, and left his family inKorea. But he was eventually caught. Life as a fugitive is not easy. Nothing iswrong with financial gaining, but as a publicly started project in South Korea,which has a moral compulsion about financial gains, the creator has declaredthat he will not secure any part for himself. It is not impossible for him tosell all his holdings (personal wallet) for financial gain. However, about 1million pieces are in each of the 15 wallets, and each wallet is currentlyvalued at about 150 billion won (150,000 won per BTC MOBICK). Such transactions would notgo unnoticed by the public, and this would destroy the trust in the projectwhich will lead to selling pressure from those who received the initialairdrop.
Because the nature of blockchain is the economic benefit which isalso the basics of mining, strong selling pressure would lead to a pricecollapse, and the ecosystem itself could collapse as well. Therefore, anyonewho buys the creator's holdings will ultimately incur a significant financialloss. In other words, there is no reason to buy, so the creator cannot sell.The creator might secretly sell some of the coins kept in another personalwallet without telling early participants. Personally, I think it is possible,but the economic loss he would face will be far greater than the benefits hewould gain. He has a bigger picture. He has presented fields where companiescould successfully enter the blockchain business. If the project goes well asdesigned, he will gain immense fame. The economic benefit he would get from sellinga part of BTC MOBICK is trivial compared to the fame.
Fame is power, and it can also be an economic benefit. And he isone of the early investors of Bitcoin, so he is not necessarily looking forfinancial gain. According to Maslow's hierarchy of needs, once human biologicaland safety needs are met, they move on to needs for esteem andself-actualization. He already has his biological and safety needs met. If hewere to sell his holdings and let the ecosystem collapse for personal gain, hecould be threatened by those who received the airdrop and those who purchasedit. It is rational to pursue higher needs rather than taking a risk forfinancial gain. This can also be seen in the example of Bitcoin's creator,Satoshi Nakamoto. The so-called Patoshi coins, which he had mined alone in theearly days of Bitcoin, are estimated to be about 1 million. And these Patoshicoins have not moved yet.
Hal Finney, a leading candidate for being Satoshi, has passedaway. However, he has a family, and he could send the addresses of his personalwallets to his family at certain intervals. Also, if Satoshi is not Hal Finney,someone could suddenly claim to be Satoshi. If Satoshi appears and tries tosell 1 million coins, considering one Bitcoin at 40 million won, it would beabout 40 trillion won.
Thereare almost no entities that could pay this huge cost, and the moment he triesto sell on the market, since it is about 1/21 of the total Bitcoin, issuance of21 million, Bitcoin is likely to collapse. But wouldn't the creator of Bitcoin,considered the discovery of the century, know this? There is no reason for anindividual to destroy his philosophically-infused invention for excessivewealth. Moreover, he could be threatened by the many people who have investedin Bitcoin. Satoshi knows this, so there will be no large sell-off of hisholdings. Once human survival needs are resolved, it is difficult to use largesums of money gained by sacrificing honor and safety, and it is not necessary.